Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing · California

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co

Industry, CA · ~143 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co runs at 469% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co: 15.5 TCR = 469% of Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co safety composite

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co: 4.5 → 21.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 22.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2021

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co's TCR rose 16.6 from 4.5 in 2017 to 21.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Industry, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 469% of ind

  • DART 9.6 DART
  • RANK #62/67
  • PHOTO AW2 Logistics Inc 41…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 94 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AW2 Logistics Inc 41-02 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co averages 15.5 TCR (469% of the Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=22.2 · 2019=15.6 · 2020=14.1 · 2021=21 · BLS 3.3

Where Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co falls in its industry

952 Pallet containers, wood or woo establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 67 Pallet containers, wood or woo employers in California.

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co (143 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co
Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co (143 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co has more employees than the Pallet containers, wood or wood and meta median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 21.0 9.6 24 0 0
2020 14.1 8.4 20 0 0
2019 15.6 6.0 21 0 0
2018 22.2 10.6 23 0 0
2017 4.5 4.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · CA · Industry

952 Pallet containers, wood or wood and metal combination, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 23 employers in Industry, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AW2 Logistics Inc 41-02 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Griffin GA 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ANDERSON FOREST PRODUCTS #1 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tower Pallet Company, LLC 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE John Kautz Farms 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deseret Farms of California 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southland Sod Farms Operations, Inc. 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Woodland WDL1 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morrow Meadows Corp. 2,022 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRL Glass Systems, Inc. 417 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anning-Johnson Company Southern California 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Freshpoint Southern California Inc 310 FTE
NAT-TCR Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets Ballard 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Princeton - Fire and Rescue Department 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZLAF 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Robert M. Greer Center 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE WTPS Osceola MRT 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vesco Oil Corp 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville Plant 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.