Electric power transmission systems · Washington

Bell Substation

Mead, WA · ~64 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Bell Substation runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power transmission systems workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.8
avg TCR · per 100 workers
1.2
industry benchmark (BLS)
3
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Bell Substation's OSHA Total Case Rate of 2.8 to the Electric power transmission systems BLS benchmark of 1.2 (232% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Bell Substation's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 1.2 industry benchmark.

11.522.533.5 20162018 3.31.2 Industry benchmarkBell Substation TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 221121.

Where Bell Substation falls in its industry

335 Electric power transmission sy establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 10 Electric power transmission sy employers in Washington.

Trend analysis for Bell Substation

Between 2016 and 2018, Bell Substation's Total Case Rate worsened from 2.3 to 3.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 46% increase across 2 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 2.3, while 2018 saw the highest rate, at 3.3, a spread of 1.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, Bell Substation recorded 3 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 3 injuries shown on this page for Bell Substation are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 221121 - Electric power transmission systems.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 121,038 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Bell Substation (this establishment) 2.78 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Electric power control industry avg 1.20 BLS IIF, NAICS 221121
Washington state avg (all industries) 6.20 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Bell Substation to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.3 0.0 2 0 0
2016 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Bell Substation's reported OSHA injury record versus its Electric power transmission systems peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 232% of the Electric power transmission systems benchmark, Bell Substation reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Electric power transmission systems sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bell Substation's safety grade?
Bell Substation has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.8 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 1.2 for Electric power transmission systems.
How many injuries has Bell Substation reported?
Bell Substation has reported 3 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2018, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Washington, and by nearby establishments in Mead - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~2.8)

Similar size (~64 workers)

Nearby in Mead

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.