Electric power transmission systems · Washington

MCC

Mead, WA · ~98 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

MCC runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power transmission systems workplace, earning a grade A.

MCC: 0.6 TCR = 48% of Electric power transmission systems BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

MCC safety composite

MCC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2018

MCC injury rate improved

MCC's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221121 · Mead, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Eversource - Berlin
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eversource - Berlin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

MCC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows MCC averages 0.6 TCR (48% of the Electric power transmission systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

MCC TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2018=0 · BLS 1.2

Where MCC falls in its industry

263 Electric power transmission sy establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Electric power transmission sy employers in Washington.

MCC (98 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate MCC
MCC (98 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 2.2

MCC has more employees than the Electric power transmission systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221121 · WA · Mead

263 Electric power transmission systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 4 employers in Mead, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Berlin 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA-Catalina Island 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Ohio Transmission SC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR John W Vaughan Mtr and Stn 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Marysville 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tatoes LLC dba Del Christensen & Sons 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inland Power and Light Company 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avista Jimmie Dean 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR North 40 Outfitters #7 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bell Substation 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mead 29 FTE
NAT-TCR Battelle - Atlanta Operations - Roybal Campus 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ANC Alaska Airlines Regional Building 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alios 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR JIS at ExxonMobil Billings 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE URP main office 1300 BHTL Rd 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Torrance 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Childress Klein 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Armstrong State University 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.