Continuing care retirement communities · North Carolina

Belle Meade Retirement Community

Southern Pines, NC · ~71 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belle Meade Retirement Community runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade B.

Belle Meade Retirement Community: 2.8 TCR = 72% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belle Meade Retirement Community safety composite

Belle Meade Retirement Community scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Belle Meade Retirement Community: 2.2 → 3.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2024

Belle Meade Retirement Community's TCR rose 1.1 from 2.2 in 2020 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Southern Pines, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 72% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #15/105
  • PHOTO ACTS Retirement-Life…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Springhouse Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Belle Meade Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belle Meade Retirement Community averages 2.8 TCR (72% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belle Meade Retirement Community TCR series: 2020=2.2 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Belle Meade Retirement Community falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 105 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Carolina.

Belle Meade Retirement Community (71 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belle Meade Retirement Community
Belle Meade Retirement Community (71 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belle Meade Retirement Community has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 3 1 0
2020 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NC · Southern Pines

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 42 employers in Southern Pines, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Springhouse Estates 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Home Office - 101 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Texas Masonic Retirement Center 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAVANNAH PLACE 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Meter To Payment - PNG 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crawford Sprinkler Co of Raleigh 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&D Coffee & Tea West Winds 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE No Evil Foods LLC 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR SJP Health Center 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penick Village Inc. 241 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Tools : MFG-Southern Pines, NC-USA 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2807-0538 201 FTE
NAT-TCR Ndx Lords Dental Studio 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Figeac Aero North America Inc 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5702 - Altoona, PA 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Advance Auto Parts DC 03 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE West Virginia Paint LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillsville Health and Rehab Center 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 840 Monticello 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-4800 Henrietta Creek Rd 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.