Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center

Greensboro, NC · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center: 16.0 TCR = 247% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center: 11.5 → 31.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 31.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.28× in 2018

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 20.1 from 11.5 in 2016 to 31.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.0 · 247% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #473/510
  • PHOTO Shawnee Colonial Est…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shawnee Colonial Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 16.0 TCR (247% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=31.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #473 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center (71 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center
Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center (71 employees, TCR 16.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Starmount Health and Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 31.7 4.5 21 0 0
2017 4.9 1.6 3 0 0
2016 11.5 11.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Greensboro

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shawnee Colonial Estates 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chase City Health & Rehab Center 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Life Services Grove City 16.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland Health & Rehab 16.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte Meter To Payment - PNG 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crawford Sprinkler Co of Raleigh 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&D Coffee & Tea West Winds 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE No Evil Foods LLC 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR A.W. Hastings & Co., LLC - Distibution Center 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Preyde One, LLC. 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Brown 16.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chase City Health & Rehab Center 16.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SLC Presidential Place 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Painting and Decorating, Inc. 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE 08-Springfield Terminal 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advance Trailer Systems 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.