Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Georgia

Belmont Village Johns Creek

Suwanee, GA · ~63 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Village Johns Creek runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Belmont Village Johns Creek: 9.9 TCR = 259% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Village Johns Creek safety composite

Belmont Village Johns Creek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Belmont Village Johns Creek: 7.0 → 7.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 20.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2024

Belmont Village Johns Creek's TCR rose 0.4 from 7.0 in 2016 to 7.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Suwanee, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 259% of ind

  • DART 7.4 DART
  • RANK #58/77
  • PHOTO Lagacy at Clover Blo…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lagacy at Clover Blossom (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Village Johns Creek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Village Johns Creek averages 9.9 TCR (259% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Village Johns Creek TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=8.9 · 2022=14.8 · 2023=20.1 · 2024=7.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Belmont Village Johns Creek falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 77 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Belmont Village Johns Creek (63 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Village Johns Creek
Belmont Village Johns Creek (63 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belmont Village Johns Creek has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.4 7.4 3 0 0
2023 20.1 17.2 7 0 0
2022 14.8 9.9 9 0 0
2021 8.9 8.9 4 0 0
2020 9.3 4.7 4 0 0
2019 6.6 5.0 4 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2017 9.8 8.2 6 0 0
2016 7.0 3.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · GA · Suwanee

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 156 employers in Suwanee, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lagacy at Clover Blossom 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Lease Management LLC dba Primrose of Bismarck 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Bay Pines 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Unlimited Contract Services - Bethune, SC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant Yates 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Operating - 205 Dairy Pac Rd. Athens 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockford 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Price Industries Inc. - Suwanee 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC06 thredUP 580 FTE
CITY-NEAR Suwanee Price Industries 512 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZZ WSI LLC 500 FTE
NAT-TCR Modern Plating Corporation 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 2008 - Fresno 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CAS025 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 0963 - Myrtle Beach 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logistec USA / Cleveland Breakbulk 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Avon Nursing Home, LLC 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kre-Bsl Husky Veronica Drive Operation LLC 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.