Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Georgia

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood

Oakwood, GA · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood: 9.8 TCR = 259% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood safety composite

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2023→2024

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood injury rate improved

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood's TCR fell 0.4 from 10.1 in 2023 to 9.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=10.1 · 2024=9.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Oakwood, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 259% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #57/77
  • PHOTO Primrose Lease Manag…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primrose Lease Management LLC dba Primrose of Bismarck (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood averages 9.8 TCR (259% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood TCR series: 2023=10.1 · 2024=9.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 77 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood (50 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood
Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood (50 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Oakwood has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.6 0.0 0 4 0
2023 10.1 2.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · GA · Oakwood

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 36 employers in Oakwood, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primrose Lease Management LLC dba Primrose of Bismarck 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Bay Pines 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lagacy at Clover Blossom 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belmont Village Johns Creek 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sowega Cotton Gin & Warehouse, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Customer Service - 1112 Veteran's Parkway Columbus, GA 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Savannah Service Center 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATL1-DWH-ATLANTA DIVISION 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Atlanta - 0705 782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foodservice Atlanta - 0705 757 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Milton's - 0705 513 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3627 362 FTE
NAT-TCR Caona - Ontario Hub 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nyman - Manhattan North 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sumitomo Bakelite North America Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hickory Village 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Micro Tool Co. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 360 Communities 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARC Industries West 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucson 10111 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.