Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Belmont Village San Jose

San Jose, CA · ~128 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Village San Jose runs at 247% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Belmont Village San Jose: 9.4 TCR = 247% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Village San Jose safety composite

Belmont Village San Jose scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Belmont Village San Jose: 8.4 → 16.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 16.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.05× in 2024

Belmont Village San Jose's TCR rose 8.3 from 8.4 in 2018 to 16.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 247% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #108/216
  • PHOTO The Health Care Cent…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Health Care Center at Richland Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Village San Jose in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Village San Jose averages 9.4 TCR (247% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Village San Jose TCR series: 2018=8.4 · 2019=7.7 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=6 · 2023=10.8 · 2024=16.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Belmont Village San Jose falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Belmont Village San Jose (128 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Village San Jose
Belmont Village San Jose (128 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belmont Village San Jose has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.8 9.9 17 0 0
2023 10.8 7.5 10 0 0
2022 6.0 5.0 6 0 0
2021 6.7 2.7 4 1 0
2020 9.3 7.4 8 2 0
2019 7.7 5.1 9 0 0
2018 8.4 7.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · San Jose

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Health Care Center at Richland Place 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson House 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillcrest 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eugene Hotel Retirement 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dick Peixoto Company 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE BATTH FARMS 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main operations location 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE McIntyre Labor Services, LLC. 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Portage 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CC&F Retail, Inc (dba Coffee Cup #4) 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cadillac Coffee Co. - Troy 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TNN011 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Belmont Village West University 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ely Concrete Construction 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crowne Plaza Seattle Airport 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Des Plaines - Police Department 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.