Retirement communities, continuing care · Florida

Belmont Village Senior Living

Ft Lauderdale, FL · ~107 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Village Senior Living runs at 293% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Belmont Village Senior Living: 11.1 TCR = 293% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Village Senior Living safety composite

Belmont Village Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−50.9

2020→2024

Belmont Village Senior Living injury rate improved

Belmont Village Senior Living's TCR fell 50.9 from 59.5 in 2020 to 8.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 59.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=59.5 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=8.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Ft Lauderdale, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.1 · 293% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #229/283
  • PHOTO Inn at Christine Val…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Inn at Christine Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Village Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Village Senior Living averages 11.1 TCR (293% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Village Senior Living TCR series: 2020=59.5 · 2021=12.1 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=15.1 · 2024=8.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Belmont Village Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #229 safest of 283 Retirement communities, contin employers in Florida.

Belmont Village Senior Living (107 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Village Senior Living
Belmont Village Senior Living (107 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belmont Village Senior Living has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.7 5.8 9 0 0
2023 15.1 8.1 15 0 0
2022 8.7 8.7 8 0 0
2021 12.1 1.7 6 1 0
2020 59.5 39.7 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Ft Lauderdale

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 76 employers in Ft Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Inn at Christine Valley 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthem Aurora Management, LLC 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rowntree Gardens 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Luther Park at Sandpoint 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE JJ Loxahatche Warehouse 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seven Springs Complex 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Florida Enterprises, Inc. 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE KGPCo Services, LLC dba Circet USA - Orlando 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLL Fort Lauderdale Airport 2,081 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4701-224 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Florida 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Galleria 761 281 FTE
NAT-TCR 2739 - Lawton 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wichita Hospitality Group 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Livermore 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR MR Steel 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Braemar Living at Medford 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yn Nunez Labor Contracting 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE DIRTT Environmental Solutions Savannah 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fareway Stores, Inc. 589 Decorah 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.