Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Braemar Living at Medford

Medford, NY · ~107 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Braemar Living at Medford runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Braemar Living at Medford: 6.4 TCR = 169% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Braemar Living at Medford safety composite

Braemar Living at Medford scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.7

2020→2024

Braemar Living at Medford injury rate improved

Braemar Living at Medford's TCR fell 22.7 from 24.7 in 2020 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=24.7 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Medford, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 169% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #145/283
  • PHOTO CSL Midlothian 2017,…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Braemar Living at Medford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Braemar Living at Medford averages 6.4 TCR (169% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Braemar Living at Medford TCR series: 2020=24.7 · 2021=3.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.8

Where Braemar Living at Medford falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #145 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Braemar Living at Medford (107 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Braemar Living at Medford
Braemar Living at Medford (107 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Braemar Living at Medford has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2020 24.7 21.6 1 23 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Medford

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 43 employers in Medford, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSL Midlothian 2017, LLC 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waltonwood Cary Parkway IL 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Manor Nevada 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clifton Senior Care, LLC 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE ToSC 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peter Luizzi & Bros. Contracting, Inc. 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSE Signals - 71st St./Roosevelt Ave Sta 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUNation Solar Systems, Inc. 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Global Tissue Group 352 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1948 - Medford 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR STOP & SHOP 0583 274 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100583 238 FTE
NAT-TCR Raising Cane'S Chicken Fingers C178 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark Roofing Co. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 2008 - Lake Worth 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1425 - Pico Rivera 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Milton J Wood Fire Protection, INC. 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Belmont Village Senior Living 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yn Nunez Labor Contracting 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE DIRTT Environmental Solutions Savannah 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.