Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · California

Belmont Village Westwood

Los Angeles, CA · ~220 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Belmont Village Westwood runs at 175% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Belmont Village Westwood: 6.6 TCR = 175% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Belmont Village Westwood safety composite

Belmont Village Westwood scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Belmont Village Westwood: 5.1 → 10.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Belmont Village Westwood's TCR rose 5.7 from 5.1 in 2018 to 10.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 175% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #65/216
  • PHOTO The Palmettos of Mau…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 82 inj
  • SIZE ~220 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Palmettos of Mauldin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Belmont Village Westwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Belmont Village Westwood averages 6.6 TCR (175% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Belmont Village Westwood TCR series: 2018=5.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=6.9 · 2023=9.8 · 2024=10.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Belmont Village Westwood falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #65 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Belmont Village Westwood (220 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Belmont Village Westwood
Belmont Village Westwood (220 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Belmont Village Westwood has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.8 9.0 18 0 0
2023 9.8 7.5 12 5 0
2022 6.9 6.3 11 0 0
2021 4.7 4.2 9 0 0
2020 6.6 6.6 15 0 0
2019 2.6 2.1 6 0 0
2018 5.1 4.2 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Los Angeles

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Palmettos of Mauldin 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keswick Pines, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Varenna 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00331-Legacy Village 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corralitos Nursery 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sempra Energy Headquarters - 50 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Placer County Water Agency (PCWA 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE JERO Corp 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Better Way Products Valdosta, GA 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TSMH Patient Fiscal Services 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR W.S Darley 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydro-Technologies, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Louisiana-Pacific Clarke County 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tennessee Housing Development Agency 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ricoh Electronics, Inc. Thermal 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kanawha Stone Company, Inc. 220 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.