Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway · Indiana

Hydro-Technologies, Inc.

Jeffersonville, IN · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hydro-Technologies, Inc. runs at 237% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway workplace, earning a grade F.

Hydro-Technologies, Inc.: 6.6 TCR = 237% of Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hydro-Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Hydro-Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hydro-Technologies, Inc.: 0.0 → 5.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.41× in 2024

Hydro-Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.5 from 0.0 in 2019 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Jeffersonville, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 237% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #79/95
  • PHOTO Tony DePaul and Son
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tony DePaul and Son (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Hydro-Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hydro-Technologies, Inc. averages 6.6 TCR (237% of the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hydro-Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=13.2 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Hydro-Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 95 Repair, highway, road, street, employers in Indiana.

Hydro-Technologies, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hydro-Technologies, Inc.
Hydro-Technologies, Inc. (39 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Hydro-Technologies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 2.7 1 1 0
2023 9.2 4.6 3 1 0
2022 7.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 13.2 0.0 7 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · IN · Jeffersonville

4,078 Repair, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 173 employers in Jeffersonville, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tony DePaul and Son 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culpeper District Bridge Crews 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RSS Akron Beltway Joint Venture 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Milbocker & Sons Inc 6.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Limestone Company Headquarters 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lafayette Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Bldg 3 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll White REMC - Monticello 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SDF8 3,574 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SDF8 3,001 FTE
CITY-NEAR RHN Clark Memorial Hospital, LLC 1,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Memorial Health 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR Van Metre Investment Properties 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR SF - 150 Executive Park, SF 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR W.S Darley 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Better Way Products Valdosta, GA 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cicero Yard 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gaines County Harvesters, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Armil CFS Main 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE RG Framing Inc 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.