Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · New Jersey

Benchmark-SNJ

Pittsgrove, NJ · ~166 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benchmark-SNJ runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Benchmark-SNJ: 8.4 TCR = 221% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benchmark-SNJ safety composite

Benchmark-SNJ scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Benchmark-SNJ: 3.6 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 22.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.42× in 2022

Benchmark-SNJ's TCR rose 0.8 from 3.6 in 2018 to 4.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 22.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Pittsgrove, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #29/38
  • PHOTO ALLI - Allegan
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~166 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ALLI - Allegan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Benchmark-SNJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benchmark-SNJ averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benchmark-SNJ TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=4.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Benchmark-SNJ falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 38 Companion services for disable employers in New Jersey.

Benchmark-SNJ (166 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benchmark-SNJ
Benchmark-SNJ (166 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Benchmark-SNJ has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.4 3.5 5 0 0
2021 22.2 10.6 12 11 0
2020 9.1 8.0 1 7 0
2019 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2018 3.6 2.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NJ · Pittsgrove

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 7 employers in Pittsgrove, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ALLI - Allegan 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PACE Akaloa 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Cumberland County NJ 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DDS South Region 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE A.P. Construction Incorporated 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE EMD Performance Materials Corp. 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE BWAY Dayton 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goya Foods South Jersey 166 FTE
CITY-NEAR DFA-CDL-BRIDGETON NJ-PLANT 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJ - Pittsgrove 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Archer Exteriors, Inc - NJ 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Glass 50 FTE
NAT-TCR 0460 - Rancho Del Rey Ca Whse 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1200 - Wichita Ks Whse 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Culver City 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1069 S Anchorage 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZGRB 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pathways Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concrete North, Inc. 166 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eldorado Country Club 166 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.