Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · New Jersey

Community Options Cumberland County NJ

Woodbury, NJ · ~110 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Community Options Cumberland County NJ runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Community Options Cumberland County NJ: 8.4 TCR = 222% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Community Options Cumberland County NJ safety composite

Community Options Cumberland County NJ scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Community Options Cumberland County NJ: 7.9 → 9.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.32× in 2024

Community Options Cumberland County NJ's TCR rose 1.1 from 7.9 in 2023 to 9.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Woodbury, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 222% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #30/38
  • PHOTO PACE Akaloa
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PACE Akaloa (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Community Options Cumberland County NJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Community Options Cumberland County NJ averages 8.4 TCR (222% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Community Options Cumberland County NJ TCR series: 2023=7.9 · 2024=9 · BLS 3.8

Where Community Options Cumberland County NJ falls in its industry

1,320 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 38 Residential Intellectual and D employers in New Jersey.

Community Options Cumberland County NJ (110 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Community Options Cumberland County NJ
Community Options Cumberland County NJ (110 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Community Options Cumberland County NJ has more employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 2.7 10 0 0
2023 7.9 7.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · NJ · Woodbury

1,320 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 33 employers in Woodbury, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PACE Akaloa 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adult Training Center 1 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Clarita Valley Committee on Aging Corp. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benchmark-SNJ 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tilcon New York - Construction 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE FCC NY Division 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA NJ Totowa 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aunt Kitty's Foods Inc. 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5476 419 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5476 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR 467 Cooper Street Operating Company, LLC 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Protocall NJ, Inc. Woodbury 175 FTE
NAT-TCR Wycod - Cody 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Okard - Ardmore 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hihlu - Honolulu Building 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nymae - Metro Queens 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mala Strana Rehabilitation Center 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Air Handling 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walker Zanger, Inc. 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nyhud - Hudson 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.