Continuing care retirement communities · North Dakota

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck

Bismarck, ND · ~220 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade C.

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck: 3.6 TCR = 94% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck safety composite

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck: 2.2 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2023

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck's TCR rose 2.8 from 2.2 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bismarck, ND AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 94% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #7/24
  • PHOTO Emerald Place
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~220 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Emerald Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck averages 3.6 TCR (94% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck TCR series: 2022=2.2 · 2023=5 · BLS 3.8

Where Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 24 Continuing care retirement com employers in North Dakota.

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck (220 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck
Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck (220 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Benedictine Living Communities of Bismarck has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.0 4.1 5 1 0
2022 2.2 1.5 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · ND · Bismarck

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 188 employers in Bismarck, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Emerald Place 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm court 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Hastings LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cedars of Chapel Hill 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tecton Products, LLC - Fargo 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oasis Petroleum - North Dakota 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0085 - Minot 219 FTE
STATE-SIZE 33100001-331001 ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER DB 221 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,Bismarck-Medical Center-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 2,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR ND,BISMARCK - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 1,715 FTE
CITY-NEAR 33180001-331801 ST ALEXIUS MEDICAL CENTER DBA CHI ST ALE 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Doosan Bismarck 1,206 FTE
NAT-TCR Riviana Foods 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 8582 - Hwy 90 @ Azalea D 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Precision Technologies, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynojet Research NV 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Freudenberg-NOK Sealing Technologies 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mariner Construction 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arcosa #1675 220 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.