Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manufacturing · California

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.

Los Angeles, CA · ~220 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.: 6.8 TCR = 205% of Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. safety composite

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2023

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. injury rate improved

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.8 from 6.7 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.7 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=9.7 · 2023=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 205% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #34/38
  • PHOTO ORLY International, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~220 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ORLY International, Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. averages 6.8 TCR (205% of the Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=9.7 · 2023=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. falls in its industry

260 Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manu establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 38 Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manu employers in California.

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. (220 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.
Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. (220 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. has more employees than the Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.9 2.9 10 0 0
2022 9.7 6.3 17 0 0
2021 5.8 2.9 12 0 0
2017 6.7 6.7 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · CA · Los Angeles

260 Make-up (i.e., cosmetics) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ORLY International, Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marcy Laboratories 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crabtree & Evelyn, Ltd Distribution Center 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Developlus Inc 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corralitos Nursery 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sempra Energy Headquarters - 50 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE Placer County Water Agency (PCWA 220 FTE
STATE-SIZE JERO Corp 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Us Autoforce Colorado Springs 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR US Foods Salt Lake City 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nelcorp Electrical Contracting 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bengtson Center for Aesthetics and Plastic Surgery 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Freudenberg-NOK Sealing Technologies 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arcosa #1675 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE JLJI Enterprises INC 220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mariner Construction 220 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.