Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka

Anoka, MN · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka runs at 365% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka: 13.9 TCR = 365% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka safety composite

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−21.8

2022→2023

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka injury rate improved

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka's TCR fell 21.8 from 24.8 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 24.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=24.8 · 2023=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Anoka, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.9 · 365% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #202/240
  • PHOTO Myrtle Beach Manor
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Myrtle Beach Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benedictine Living Community | Anoka averages 13.9 TCR (365% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka TCR series: 2022=24.8 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Benedictine Living Community | Anoka falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #202 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka (43 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Benedictine Living Community | Anoka
Benedictine Living Community | Anoka (43 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Benedictine Living Community | Anoka has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 0.0 0 1 0
2022 24.8 24.8 0 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Anoka

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 100 employers in Anoka, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Myrtle Beach Manor 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village Gate of Farmington 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Peregrine Senior Living at Crimson Ridge Gardens 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Pablo 13.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Federal Cartridge Company 1,582 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoffman Enclosures Inc 1,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hoffman Industries, LLC 1,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Service Center 1,095 FTE
NAT-TCR Village Gate of Farmington 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peregrine Senior Living at Crimson Ridge Gardens 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Triple Crown Trailers, LLC 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00190 13.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Muir Omni Graphics 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caliber Construction, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henry Mechanical 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greer (Polyiso) 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.