Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Fremont Village Senior Living

Zimmerman, MN · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fremont Village Senior Living runs at 490% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Fremont Village Senior Living: 18.6 TCR = 490% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fremont Village Senior Living safety composite

Fremont Village Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−40.4

2022→2023

Fremont Village Senior Living injury rate improved

Fremont Village Senior Living's TCR fell 40.4 from 59.0 in 2022 to 18.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 59.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=59.0 · 2023=18.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Zimmerman, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.6 · 490% of ind

  • DART 18.6 DART
  • RANK #225/240
  • PHOTO Gables of Canton LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gables of Canton LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Fremont Village Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fremont Village Senior Living averages 18.6 TCR (490% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fremont Village Senior Living TCR series: 2022=59 · 2023=18.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Fremont Village Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Fremont Village Senior Living (43 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fremont Village Senior Living
Fremont Village Senior Living (43 employees, TCR 18.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Fremont Village Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 18.6 18.6 5 0 0
2022 59.0 59.0 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Zimmerman

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 13 employers in Zimmerman, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gables of Canton LLC 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elderberry Square Community 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RD-HHH1-SPRING ARBOR RICHMOND 18.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Ravenna 18.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Living Options 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zimmerman Middle High School 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 728 Zimmerman Middle/High School 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 728 Zimmerman Elementary 73 FTE
NAT-TCR 479511-MEM-FRAYSER 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lasc Admin 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Northbrook - Public Works 18.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Services Group - Cimarron 18.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE MCRT2 Richmond Tenant LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Galva KS KS 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE TurnAround, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Terrace Hermiston 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.