Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee

Shakopee, MN · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee: 5.7 TCR = 149% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee safety composite

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee: 0.0 → 11.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2022

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee's TCR rose 11.3 from 0.0 in 2020 to 11.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Shakopee, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 149% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #81/226
  • PHOTO Greenspring Village
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenspring Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benedictine Living Community Shakopee averages 5.7 TCR (149% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=11.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Benedictine Living Community Shakopee falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee (43 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benedictine Living Community Shakopee
Benedictine Living Community Shakopee (43 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Benedictine Living Community Shakopee has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.3 4.5 4 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Shakopee

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 180 employers in Shakopee, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenspring Village 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kendal at Hanover 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado Red Rock - 478 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Epworth Living INC 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MSP1 2,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MSP1 2,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entrust Corporation 1,448 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Automation Solutions - Shakopee 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Hg1011 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00750 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Lexington Tanbark Road, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 352888-Flg-Corona/Elmhurst Carrier Anx 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 9123-Vny-Prime Appearance 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE LeRoy IGA 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso IGA 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG587 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.