Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Louisiana

Benteler Shreveport

Shreveport, LA · ~363 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benteler Shreveport runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Benteler Shreveport: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benteler Shreveport safety composite

Benteler Shreveport scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2022

Benteler Shreveport injury rate improved

Benteler Shreveport's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.7 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.7 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Shreveport, LA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #7/9
  • PHOTO Berg Pipe Mobile
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~363 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Berg Pipe Mobile (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Benteler Shreveport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benteler Shreveport averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benteler Shreveport TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Benteler Shreveport falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 9 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Louisiana.

Benteler Shreveport (363 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Benteler Shreveport
Benteler Shreveport (363 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Benteler Shreveport has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.7 2.0 11 0 0
2021 1.5 0.8 4 0 0
2019 3.7 2.9 18 1 0
2018 5.9 4.2 33 1 0
2016 3.7 2.9 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · LA · Shreveport

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 403 employers in Shreveport, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Berg Pipe Mobile 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Independence Tube Trinity 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viant Collegeville, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR American SpiralWeld Pipe Co., Southwest Division 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Halliburton Capitol Dr 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 7301 363 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4818-48180052-111 RIVERBEND DR-WC 362 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1193 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Medical Center 3,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNIVERSITY HEALTH SHEREVPORT, LLC d/b/a OCHSNER LSU HEALTH SHREVEPORT 2,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Shreveport 2,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 1,567 FTE
NAT-TCR GreenTree Shavings, LLC. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR L&H Threaded Rods Corp. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ellsworth Construction 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Y Foods, Inc. Westfield Shops 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4795-Ea-Lga-New York - Laguardia-Lga-Trml 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4895 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE 253921-Grand Rapids Mi P&Dc 363 FTE
NAT-SIZE CDI Energy Products 363 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.