Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel · Pennsylvania

Viant Collegeville, LLC

Trappe, PA · ~308 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Viant Collegeville, LLC runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade C.

Viant Collegeville, LLC: 3.4 TCR = 104% of Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Viant Collegeville, LLC safety composite

Viant Collegeville, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2018→2021

Viant Collegeville, LLC injury rate improved

Viant Collegeville, LLC's TCR fell 4.5 from 6.0 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.0 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.0 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Trappe, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 104% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #10/32
  • PHOTO Main Plant
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~308 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Viant Collegeville, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Viant Collegeville, LLC averages 3.4 TCR (104% of the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Viant Collegeville, LLC TCR series: 2018=6 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Viant Collegeville, LLC falls in its industry

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 32 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, loc employers in Pennsylvania.

Viant Collegeville, LLC (308 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Viant Collegeville, LLC
Viant Collegeville, LLC (308 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Viant Collegeville, LLC has more employees than the Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.5 1.5 4 0 0
2020 2.6 1.3 8 0 0
2019 3.5 3.2 12 0 0
2018 6.0 3.9 19 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · PA · Trappe

329 Tube (e.g., heavy riveted, lock joint, seamless, welded) made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main Plant 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meyer Utility Structures 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth Tube Company - Trent 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Synergy Manufacturing, Inc. 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bridge and Decking Constrution 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA - Aspers - 45 Aspers North Rd - Mott's LLP 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allentown East (305) 308 FTE
STATE-SIZE Work & Outdoor Group Division 308 FTE
CITY-NEAR SP Industries Inc HB Instrument 27 FTE
NAT-TCR Bauer Equipment America texas 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR SC & ASF - Voorhees 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Albuquerque North 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lahey Health Primary Care Arlington 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northlake IL 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE ExxonMobil Chemical Baton Rouge Plastics Plant 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE John Deere Sales and Marketing Unit 17 308 FTE
NAT-SIZE Durham Exchange Club Industries 308 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.