Distribution of electric power · Tennessee

Benton County Electric System

Camden, TN · ~42 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Benton County Electric System runs at 543% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Benton County Electric System: 6.5 TCR = 543% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Benton County Electric System safety composite

Benton County Electric System scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2016→2022

Benton County Electric System injury rate improved

Benton County Electric System's TCR fell 9.4 from 12.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.0 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Camden, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 543% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #54/70
  • PHOTO Eufaula State Docks …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eufaula State Docks Road Complex - APC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Benton County Electric System in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Benton County Electric System averages 6.5 TCR (543% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Benton County Electric System TCR series: 2016=12 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=14.4 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Benton County Electric System falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #54 safest of 70 Distribution of electric power employers in Tennessee.

Benton County Electric System (42 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Benton County Electric System
Benton County Electric System (42 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Benton County Electric System has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.6 0.0 0 1 0
2021 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.2 0.0 2 1 0
2018 14.4 8.6 3 2 0
2017 5.8 2.9 2 0 0
2016 12.0 6.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · TN · Camden

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 18 employers in Camden, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eufaula State Docks Road Complex - APC 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Division Wetumpka Office 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lewis County PUD - Morton Operations 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dixie Electric Cooperative - Union Springs Location 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Citizens Gas Utility District 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Providence Builders 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCC Johnson City 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allen Searcy Builder Contractors 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jones Plastic & Engineering d/b/a Camden Plastics 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 738 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR 738 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Camden Division 217 FTE
NAT-TCR White Rock Headstart 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Grayson View 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bessler Auto Parts 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SDO-ODFL 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hyde's Air Conditioning 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suncoast Paving Inc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lippert Bros., Inc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Roofing Contractor 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.