Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Maryland

Berkel Piling Washington DC

Silver Spring, MD · ~37 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Berkel Piling Washington DC runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Berkel Piling Washington DC: 3.0 TCR = 109% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Berkel Piling Washington DC safety composite

Berkel Piling Washington DC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2020→2024

Berkel Piling Washington DC injury rate improved

Berkel Piling Washington DC's TCR fell 4.3 from 6.7 in 2020 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.7 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Silver Spring, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 109% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #12/30
  • PHOTO Tar Heel Winston
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tar Heel Winston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Berkel Piling Washington DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Berkel Piling Washington DC averages 3.0 TCR (109% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Berkel Piling Washington DC TCR series: 2020=6.7 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Berkel Piling Washington DC falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 30 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Maryland.

Berkel Piling Washington DC (37 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Berkel Piling Washington DC
Berkel Piling Washington DC (37 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Berkel Piling Washington DC has fewer employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.7 6.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · MD · Silver Spring

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 160 employers in Silver Spring, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tar Heel Winston 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morello Concrete Construction, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mead Construction Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE CFM Engineering 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foulger Pratt Contracting, LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OAK CONTRACTING LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE 434 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring 3,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Hospital-Silver Spring-HCH-MD 2,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist HealthCare, Inc., d/b/a Adventist HealthCare White Oak Medical Center 1,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riderwood Village 1,375 FTE
NAT-TCR Benny's Car Wash of Gonzales 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR David Kopf Instruments 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Manufacturing - C1 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GS Ashley LLC 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Adm, Rh, Fin 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE HEU1 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tria Restaurant 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edward Homes 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.