Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction · Texas

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla

Houston, TX · ~105 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla: 3.0 TCR = 109% of Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla safety composite

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2020→2021

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla injury rate improved

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla's TCR fell 2.2 from 4.2 in 2020 to 1.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.2 · 2021=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #83/125
  • PHOTO Morello Concrete Con…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morello Concrete Construction, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla averages 3.0 TCR (109% of the Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla TCR series: 2020=4.2 · 2021=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla falls in its industry

1,314 Retaining wall (except anchore establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #83 safest of 125 Retaining wall (except anchore employers in Texas.

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla (105 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla
Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla (105 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Keystone Concrete Placement Tesla has more employees than the Retaining wall (except anchored earth), median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.9 0.0 3 0 0
2020 4.2 2.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · TX · Houston

1,314 Retaining wall (except anchored earth), poured concrete, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morello Concrete Construction, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mead Construction Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR IBK CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berkel Piling Washington DC 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NAUR Pecos Office 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Texas District 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harrington Station-031 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Galaxy Builders Ltd. 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Eastgate Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Built 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Infinite Glass and Metal, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Crabtree 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Window Corp. 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matalco (US) Inc. Lordstown 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE The St. Cloud Village 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.