Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Berkshire Commons

Reading, PA · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Berkshire Commons runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Berkshire Commons: 7.1 TCR = 188% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Berkshire Commons safety composite

Berkshire Commons scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Berkshire Commons: 7.6 → 9.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.64× in 2020

Berkshire Commons's TCR rose 1.6 from 7.6 in 2016 to 9.2 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 188% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #111/233
  • PHOTO The Pearl at Jamestown
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Pearl at Jamestown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Berkshire Commons in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Berkshire Commons averages 7.1 TCR (188% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Berkshire Commons TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Berkshire Commons falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Berkshire Commons (44 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Berkshire Commons
Berkshire Commons (44 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Berkshire Commons has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 9.2 4.6 4 0 0
2019 9.1 9.1 2 2 0
2018 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 7.2 7.2 3 0 0
2016 7.6 7.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Reading

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Pearl at Jamestown 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oaks at Beaufort 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthology of Blue Ash 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Meadows Associates / George M Leader Family Corporation / Leader Holdings 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milton Grove Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Donegal Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESSC West Shore Service Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUNSC Sunbury Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Marriott Burr Ridge 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cannon East 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Rapids Hotel Group, LLC. 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Shared Field Services 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Insource Performance Solutions at Dr Pepper Snapple Victorville 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercury Dining Room & Rail 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE 991 Houston DC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Crystal Sugar Technical Services 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.