Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · Pennsylvania

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc.

Reading, PA · ~101 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade D.

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 152% of Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. safety composite

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2019

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. injury rate improved

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 5.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=4.0 · 2019=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 152% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO CPI Security Knoxvil…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CPI Security Knoxville Division (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (152% of the Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=4 · 2019=2.8 · BLS 2.6

Where Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. falls in its industry

161 Security alarm systems sales c establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Security alarm systems sales c employers in Pennsylvania.

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Berkshire Systems Group, Inc.
Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. (101 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. has more employees than the Security alarm systems sales combined wi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.8 2.8 3 0 0
2017 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2016 5.0 3.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · PA · Reading

161 Security alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CPI Security Knoxville Division 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NYCM-90-NEW YORK, NY - MUTUAL 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Time and Alarm Systems 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safe Haven Security Services LLC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE P. Agnes, Inc. 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE IA Construction Corporation 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Klover Sepa Inc 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Glass and Metal Co., Inc. 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Pocahontas Warehouse 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Brookshire 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Community 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Pleasant Hills 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Barnes Bullets, LLC 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE #71 Art Van Lansing 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE CIR Electrical Construction Corp 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gwinnett 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.