Industry profile · NAICS 561621

Alarm system monitoring services

Workplace injury rates across 206 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

206
Employers
2.5
Avg TCR
2.6
BLS benchmark
997
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Alarm system monitoring services average 2.5 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 2.6.

2.5
avg TCR · reporting employers
2.6
BLS national benchmark
206
employers reporting
997
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Alarm system monitoring services Safety Data Reveals

The Alarm system monitoring services sector (NAICS 561621) encompasses 206 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 997 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 2.5 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 2.6 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 2.5 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Alarm system monitoring services that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 5
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Oklahoma City Tulsa, OK F 16.3
Integrated Security Solutions, Inc. Cottage Grove, WI F 14.7
Tilley Fire Equipment Company Doylestown, PA F 13.2
Synergy Florida Tampa, FL F 12.7
Smart Systems Technologies, Inc. Irvine, CA F 10.1
Smart Systems Technologies, Inc. (Tempe) Tempe, AZ F 10.1
Wright Hennepin Security Rockford, MN F 8.8
Security Sistems Services Carolina, PR F 8.4
Sonitrol Nevada Las Vegas, NV F 7.6
Security Solutions Northwest Everett Everett, WA F 7.2
Brown Security Solutions Hamburg, NY F 7.0
Alltech Integrations, Corp Potsdam, NY F 6.8
GSS Centro Monitoreo Carolina, PR F 6.7
Martin Systems Inc. Green Bay, WI F 5.5
Afa Nj Branch Syosset, NY F 5.4
Alarm Services Network Auburn Hills, MI D 5.2
Nextgen Systems LLC Las Vegas, NV D 5.0
West Langhorne FS (SSS, CSS) West Langhorne, PA D 4.8
CPI Security Greensboro Division Greensboro, NC D 4.8
Bellingham Lock and Safe dba Security Solutions Bellingham, WA D 4.8
Custom Alarm Business Office Rochester, MN D 4.7
CPI Security Greenville Division Greenville, SC D 4.6
Salem Fire Alarm Salem, OR D 4.6
West Sacramento FS (SSS, CSS) West Sacramento, CA D 4.6
Time and Alarm Systems Mira Loma, CA D 4.2
Nycm-90-New York, Ny - Mutual New York, NY D 4.1
CPI Security Knoxville Division Knoxville, TN D 4.1
Berkshire Systems Group, Inc. Reading, PA D 3.9
Safe Haven Security Services LLC Kansas City, MO D 3.6
First Alarm Aptos, CA D 3.5
Global Fire & Safety Denver, CO D 3.5
Heartland Security Services, LLC Melrose, MN D 3.5
Fishers-Corrections FS (SSS,CSS) Fishers, IN D 3.5
Caan-90-Anaheim, Ca Anaheim, CA D 3.4
Orlando - 410 Oviedo, FL D 3.3
Nashville FS (SSS,CSS) Nashville, TN D 3.2
California Safety Company, Inc Redding, CA C 3.1
Afa Ma Branch Syosset, NY C 3.1
Afa Fl Branch Syosset, NY C 3.1
Protection Systems, LLC Carrollton, TX C 3.1
ADS Security Nashville, TN C 3.0
Nyck-90-New York, Ny - Kastle New York, NY C 2.9
Life Safety Systems Blaine, MN C 2.9
Long Island City FS (SSS, CSS) Long Island City, NY C 2.9
TX134 Carrollton, TX C 2.8
DynaFire Casselberry, FL C 2.8
St. Louis FS (SSS, CSS) St. Louis, MO C 2.8
Sierra Group Glendale, CA C 2.8
CPI Security Raleigh Division Morrisville, NC C 2.8
Securitas Electronic Security, Inc. Uniontown, OH C 2.7
Page 1 of 5 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Alarm system monitoring services?

This sector averages 2.5 against a BLS benchmark of 2.6 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.