Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Advance, NC · ~118 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 3.1 TCR = 48% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center: 2.3 → 3.9 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2017

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 1.6 from 2.3 in 2016 to 3.9 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Advance, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 3.1 · 48% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #94/510
  • PHOTO Western Convalescent…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~118 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western Convalescent Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center averages 3.1 TCR (48% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=3.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (118 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (118 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Bermuda Commons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2016 2.3 1.2 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Advance

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 18 employers in Advance, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western Convalescent Hospital 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverstone SNF 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Place, LLC dba Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Resources HealthCare Fund dba LCC of Hammond Whiting 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE D34 Charlotte 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Skin Food Group 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yanjan USA LLC 118 FTE
STATE-SIZE H.W. Culp Lumber Company Inc 118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashley Furniture Industries - Advance 1,519 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advance NC Facility 1,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashley Furniture Industries Inc 1,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashley Distribution Services, Ltd. - North Carolina 182 FTE
NAT-TCR TN-Nashville-Operating Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Savannah (Gasav) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PolyOne 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 700 - Shippensburg Bobcat 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of St Charles LLC 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Springfield East LLC 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trig's Everest Metro 118 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jessicas Brick Oven 118 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.