Vending machine merchandisers, sale of products · Wisconsin

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser

Dresser, WI · ~18 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vending machine merchandisers, sale of products workplace, earning a grade F.

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser: 7.6 TCR = 223% of Vending machine merchandisers, sale of products BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser safety composite

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2018→2024

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser injury rate improved

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser's TCR fell 4.8 from 13.5 in 2018 to 8.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.5 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=8.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454210 · Dresser, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 223% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #3/10
  • PHOTO Servomation Refreshm…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~18 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Servomation Refreshments, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser averages 7.6 TCR (223% of the Vending machine merchandisers, sale of products BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser TCR series: 2018=13.5 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=9.1 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.4

Where Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser falls in its industry

311 Vending machine merchandisers, establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 10 Vending machine merchandisers, employers in Wisconsin.

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser (18 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser
Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser (18 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1

Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser has fewer employees than the Vending machine merchandisers, sale of p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 8.6 1 0 0
2023 8.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 9.1 9.1 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.8 7.8 1 0 0
2019 5.7 5.7 1 0 0
2018 13.5 13.5 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454210 · WI · Dresser

311 Vending machine merchandisers, sale of products employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 7 employers in Dresser, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Servomation Refreshments, Inc. 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORCROSS, GA BRANCH 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Class Vending 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accent Food Services Houston 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gardner Cranberry 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE King's Valley Ag 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Richmond Agronom 18 FTE
STATE-SIZE Altius Building Company 18 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tenere Metals Division 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tenere Metals Division Dresser 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trollhaugen Ski Area 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bernicks Pepsi of Dresser 99 FTE
NAT-TCR Windsor Willits Company Windsor Mill 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Corydon Plant 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR WellSpan Specialty Services 7.6 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.