Automatic merchandising machine operators · New York

Servomation Refreshments, Inc.

Canastota, NY · ~159 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Servomation Refreshments, Inc. runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automatic merchandising machine operators workplace, earning a grade F.

Servomation Refreshments, Inc.: 7.6 TCR = 225% of Automatic merchandising machine operators BLS 3.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Servomation Refreshments, Inc. safety composite

Servomation Refreshments, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Servomation Refreshments, Inc.: 6.0 → 11.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2024

Servomation Refreshments, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.1 from 6.0 in 2018 to 11.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 454210 · Canastota, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 225% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO NORCROSS, GA BRANCH
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 75 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NORCROSS, GA BRANCH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Servomation Refreshments, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Servomation Refreshments, Inc. averages 7.6 TCR (225% of the Automatic merchandising machine operators BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Servomation Refreshments, Inc. TCR series: 2018=6 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=6.9 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=11.1 · BLS 3.4

Where Servomation Refreshments, Inc. falls in its industry

311 Automatic merchandising machin establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 Automatic merchandising machin employers in New York.

Servomation Refreshments, Inc. (159 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Servomation Refreshments, Inc.
Servomation Refreshments, Inc. (159 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 7.1

Servomation Refreshments, Inc. has more employees than the Automatic merchandising machine operator median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.1 8.3 20 0 0
2023 8.1 5.0 13 0 0
2022 8.6 8.6 11 0 0
2021 8.6 7.7 10 0 0
2020 6.9 5.3 9 0 0
2019 4.3 4.3 5 1 0
2018 6.0 5.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

454210 · NY · Canastota

311 Automatic merchandising machine operators employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 19 employers in Canastota, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NORCROSS, GA BRANCH 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Class Vending 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accent Food Services Houston 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bernicks Full Line Vending of Dresser 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NORTHPORT Powerstation-NY66 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE New York Office 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE 198 Grumman Rd 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Davis-Fetch Corp. 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dutchland Plastics LLC 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canastota Facility 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abscope Environmental Inc. 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR CANASTOTA 73 FTE
NAT-TCR Jim Isaac Construction 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Scosta Corp. Bowling Green 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Livingston County 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marriott Burbank 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jeff Foster Trucking Incorporated 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-MD-Beltsville-Virginia Manor Road 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE War Memorial Hospital 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.