General warehousing and storage · Illinois

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc.

Joliet, IL · ~29 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc.: 1.5 TCR = 26% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. safety composite

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc.: 0.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.01× in 2019

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc.'s TCR rose 3.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.0 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Joliet, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 26% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #99/551
  • PHOTO Bose Yuma
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bose Yuma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. averages 1.5 TCR (26% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3 · BLS 5.8

Where Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #99 safest of 551 General warehousing and storag employers in Illinois.

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. (29 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc.
Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. (29 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Berryman Transfer and Storage Company Inc. has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IL · Joliet

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 281 employers in Joliet, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bose Yuma 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Behr Standard 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 200 Commercial Street Watertown CT 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Tampa FL-Tampa Point Blvd (3808) 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bloomington Office-Shunk Corp 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. Chicago 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARBOR - GRAYSLAKE CCCSD 46 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asbury of Kankakee 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Of Will 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 2,361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW2 2,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Joliet 2,089 FTE
NAT-TCR Mann Mechanical Co. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryker Demolition & Environmental Services, LLC 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Micron Optics, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-OSC 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE JCFS- Norfolk Branch 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arnold Oil Company - Location 1123 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Double S Transport Inc 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Laurel (HP) 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.