Christmas tree assemblies, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing · Texas

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston

Houston, TX · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Christmas tree assemblies, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Christmas tree assemblies, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston safety composite

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston: 0.0 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 2.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2018

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston's TCR rose 2.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #124/208
  • PHOTO Hunting Titan, Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hunting Titan, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Christmas tree assemblies, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston falls in its industry

316 Christmas tree assemblies, oil establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #124 safest of 208 Christmas tree assemblies, oil employers in Texas.

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston (57 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston
Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston (57 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Best Flow Line Equipment L.P.- Houston has fewer employees than the Christmas tree assemblies, oil and gas f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.7 1.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Houston

316 Christmas tree assemblies, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hunting Titan, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richey Rd 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOV-Breen 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PFT-HOUSTON BREEN 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR BCI Tennessee Division 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nicholson Mfg. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cenveo Hurlock 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR College of Wooster 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE West-Winds Contracting, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #119 (Dixon, IL) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #145 (Monmouth, IL) 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #171 (Plover, WI) 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.