Homes for the elderly without nursing care · Texas

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge

The Woodlands, TX · ~57 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge runs at 373% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly without nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge: 14.2 TCR = 373% of Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge safety composite

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.3

2016→2022

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge injury rate improved

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge's TCR fell 9.3 from 18.1 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 18.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.1 · 2017=18.3 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=18.5 · 2022=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · The Woodlands, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 373% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #429/470
  • PHOTO Heartis Arlington
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heartis Arlington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Conservatory at Alden Bridge averages 14.2 TCR (373% of the Homes for the elderly without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge TCR series: 2016=18.1 · 2017=18.3 · 2018=7 · 2019=18.5 · 2022=8.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Conservatory at Alden Bridge falls in its industry

6,510 Homes for the elderly without establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #429 safest of 470 Homes for the elderly without employers in Texas.

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge (57 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Conservatory at Alden Bridge
The Conservatory at Alden Bridge (57 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Conservatory at Alden Bridge has more employees than the Homes for the elderly without nursing ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.8 0.0 4 0 0
2019 18.5 2.3 8 0 0
2018 7.0 7.0 3 0 0
2017 18.3 16.0 8 0 0
2016 18.1 18.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · The Woodlands

6,510 Homes for the elderly without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 160 employers in The Woodlands, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heartis Arlington 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Monticello 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABBY LAFAYETTE LLC 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Midland 14.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Waco Hatchery 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Natural Resources Cedar Lake location 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE CKJ Transport - Energy Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strike 3,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR MedData, Inc. 2,438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital 2,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR W W Webber LLC 1,948 FTE
NAT-TCR Magic City Enterprises, Inc. 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-02702 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 0583 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Baxley 14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG266 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG293 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hardy Hole Drilling 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schaumburg Jaguar Land Rover 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.