Employer · Massachusetts

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, MA · ~12,804 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade B.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center: 5.0 TCR = 67% of industry BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center safety composite

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center injury rate improved

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center's TCR fell 1.2 from 5.8 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2019=6.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Boston, MA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 5.0 · 67% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #41/87
  • PHOTO 700 Cooper
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2,402 inj
  • SIZE ~12,804 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 700 Cooper (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center averages 5.0 TCR (67% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2019=6.2 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 7.5

Where Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 industry establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 87 industry employers in Massachusetts.

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (12,804 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (12,804 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 2.4 386 12 0
2023 4.6 2.7 284 111 0
2022 3.6 1.9 317 27 0
2021 5.3 2.1 442 31 0
2019 6.2 3.1 523 41 0
2016 5.8 2.9 450 47 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MA · Boston

6,862 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 577 employers in Boston, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 700 Cooper 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 299 THE HOSPITALS OF PROVIDENCE TRANSMOUNTAI 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Georgia Medical Center Barrow 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KSWIC062 ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI ST FRANCIS HOSP 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE C&W Services 12,800 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boston Children's Hospital 13,082 FTE
STATE-SIZE UMass Memorial Health 12,452 FTE
STATE-SIZE 67570001 BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER 13,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR Massachusetts General Hospital 26,855 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Women's Hospital 19,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham and Womens Hospital 19,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brigham & Women's Hospital 18,260 FTE
NAT-TCR Royal Foods Inc 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette H Otel Associates Del, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Elliott Aviation of Des Moines 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SGA2 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mission Palms Healthcare Center 12,800 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wynn Las Vegas 12,830 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO002 12,691 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.