Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Indiana

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute

Terre Haute, IN · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute runs at 612% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute: 23.2 TCR = 612% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute safety composite

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.8

2016→2017

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute injury rate improved

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute's TCR fell 11.8 from 29.1 in 2016 to 17.3 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 29.1 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=29.1 · 2017=17.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Terre Haute, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.2 · 612% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #133/133
  • PHOTO Brookdale Denver Tec…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Denver Tech Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute averages 23.2 TCR (612% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute TCR series: 2016=29.1 · 2017=17.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 133 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute (39 employees, TCR 23.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute
Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute (39 employees, TCR 23.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bethesda Gardens of Terre Haute has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 17.3 5.8 6 0 0
2016 29.1 8.7 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IN · Terre Haute

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 194 employers in Terre Haute, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Denver Tech Center 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Cottage-Hershey 23.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Haven Villa 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-X Warwick LLC 23.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Limestone Company Headquarters 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lafayette Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Bldg 3 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll White REMC - Monticello 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Terre Haute Regional Hospital 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Union Hospital Terre Haute 697 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vigo County Government 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Terre Haute 661 FTE
NAT-TCR Legend Parcel Service 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR San Benito 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 389228-Yng-Main Office Sta 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Arcadia Care Clifton 23.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rai Mx Ewr 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Gerald Inc 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Textron Specialized Vehicles - Premier De-icers 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russ Darrow LLC 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.