Ducks, slaughtering and dressing · Indiana

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House

Leesburg, IN · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House runs at 508% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ducks, slaughtering and dressing workplace, earning a grade F.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House: 16.8 TCR = 508% of Ducks, slaughtering and dressing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House safety composite

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.1

2018→2024

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House injury rate improved

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House's TCR fell 17.1 from 30.0 in 2018 to 12.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 30.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=30.0 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=18.7 · 2021=10.3 · 2023=18.9 · 2024=12.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Leesburg, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.8 · 508% of ind

  • DART 12.9 DART
  • RANK #13/17
  • PHOTO henningsen foods
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: henningsen foods (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House averages 16.8 TCR (508% of the Ducks, slaughtering and dressing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House TCR series: 2018=30 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=18.7 · 2021=10.3 · 2023=18.9 · 2024=12.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House falls in its industry

509 Ducks, slaughtering and dressi establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Ducks, slaughtering and dressi employers in Indiana.

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House (39 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House
Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House (39 employees, TCR 16.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Holding House has fewer employees than the Ducks, slaughtering and dressing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.9 12.9 5 0 0
2023 18.9 15.1 5 0 0
2021 10.3 8.2 4 1 0
2020 18.7 14.0 8 0 0
2019 9.7 9.7 4 0 0
2018 30.0 25.0 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · IN · Leesburg

509 Ducks, slaughtering and dressing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 4 employers in Leesburg, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR henningsen foods 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAPLE LEAF FARMS, INC. - non-union HOLDING HOUSE & LIVE HAUL 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., Cromwell Hatchery 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Case Farms Canton Ohio garage 17.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Limestone Company Headquarters 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lafayette Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Bldg 3 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll White REMC - Monticello 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Leaf Farms, Inc., World Headquarters 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kosciusko Ambulance Service LLC 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lassus Store 40 26 FTE
NAT-TCR AZP026 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1426 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR BNAMU - Residence Inn Murfreesboro 16.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1129 16.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 400 Hie, LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Department of Public Works/Parks 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE AeroRepair South LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE AeroRepair Corp NH 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.