Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Iowa

Bickford of Cedar Falls

Cedar Falls, IA · ~35 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Cedar Falls runs at 230% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Cedar Falls: 8.8 TCR = 230% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Cedar Falls safety composite

Bickford of Cedar Falls scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2021

Bickford of Cedar Falls injury rate improved

Bickford of Cedar Falls's TCR fell 2.5 from 16.1 in 2016 to 13.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 96.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.1 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=96.3 · 2021=13.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cedar Falls, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.8 · 230% of ind

  • DART 13.6 DART
  • RANK #63/121
  • PHOTO Mary's Woods at Mary…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mary's Woods at Marylhurst (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Cedar Falls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Cedar Falls averages 8.8 TCR (230% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Cedar Falls TCR series: 2016=16.1 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=96.3 · 2021=13.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Cedar Falls falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 121 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

Bickford of Cedar Falls (35 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Cedar Falls
Bickford of Cedar Falls (35 employees, TCR 8.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Cedar Falls has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 13.6 13.6 1 2 0
2020 96.3 89.9 1 14 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2016 16.1 16.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IA · Cedar Falls

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 88 employers in Cedar Falls, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mary's Woods at Marylhurst 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franciscan Village 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR River Bend Retirement Community 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesbury United Methodist Community 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE IA17-SEL-OSCEOLA HATCHERY' 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Algona Research - ALG2 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE JFSNA at ADM Cedar Rapids 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE On Track Construction, LLC 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR John Deere Waterloo Works Product Engineering Center 1,508 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0590 - Cedar Falls IA DC 1,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0590 - Cedar Falls DC 936 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Home Services 752 FTE
NAT-TCR Performance Denver - 1024 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Richfield Municipal Center - Public Safety 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel 8.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Augustana Apple Valley Villa 194 8.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bickford of Battle Creek 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluebird Estates 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iten Industries Plant 4 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE SNA Orange County - 1200 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.