Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Iowa

RidgeView Assisted Living

Cedar Rapids, IA · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RidgeView Assisted Living runs at 671% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

RidgeView Assisted Living: 25.5 TCR = 671% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RidgeView Assisted Living safety composite

RidgeView Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 33.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

RidgeView Assisted Living: 13.1 → 41.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 41.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2018

RidgeView Assisted Living's TCR rose 28.8 from 13.1 in 2016 to 41.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Cedar Rapids, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.5 · 671% of ind

  • DART 33.5 DART
  • RANK #116/121
  • PHOTO Dublin Square
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dublin Square (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

RidgeView Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RidgeView Assisted Living averages 25.5 TCR (671% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RidgeView Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=13.1 · 2017=21.5 · 2018=41.9 · BLS 3.8

Where RidgeView Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #116 safest of 121 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

RidgeView Assisted Living (35 employees, TCR 25.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate RidgeView Assisted Living
RidgeView Assisted Living (35 employees, TCR 25.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

RidgeView Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 41.9 33.5 5 0 0
2017 21.5 21.5 6 0 0
2016 13.1 8.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IA · Cedar Rapids

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 466 employers in Cedar Rapids, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dublin Square 25.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Blaine 25.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2643-48060001-480601 25.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra Ridge Memory Care 25.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE IA17-SEL-OSCEOLA HATCHERY' 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience - Algona Research - ALG2 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE JFSNA at ADM Cedar Rapids 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE On Track Construction, LLC 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins (Cedar Rapids IA 400 NE) 6,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins - Cedar Rapids C Ave 6,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR CRST EXPEDITED INC 3,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Methodist Hospital 2,949 FTE
NAT-TCR TRI-L Manufacturing, Inc 25.5 TCR
NAT-TCR The Whiteface Lodge 25.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0577 25.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bethesda Meadow 25.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Springfield Woodside 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Bethlehem 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western of Texas Forge & Flange Co. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocy - Nb Starr 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.