Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · Arizona

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc.

Tucson, AZ · ~20 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade C.

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 91% of Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. safety composite

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc.: 0.0 → 14.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 14.9 TCR · DART/TCR 5.83× in 2023

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 14.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 14.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 5.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Tucson, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 91% of ind

  • DART 14.9 DART
  • RANK #23/43
  • PHOTO PERIMETER SECURITY G…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PERIMETER SECURITY GROUP, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (91% of the Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=14.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Fencing contractors (except el establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 43 Fencing contractors (except el employers in Arizona.

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. (20 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc.
Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. (20 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Biff Baker Fence Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Fencing contractors (except electronic c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 14.9 14.9 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · AZ · Tucson

1,634 Fencing contractors (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PERIMETER SECURITY GROUP, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kleenco Maintenance & Construction, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 027 Spokane WA Barnhart Crane and Rigging LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elyria Fence Inc. 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE A. Oseguera Company 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems - ANS12 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems (Plant) - ANSP581 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucson Corporate Office 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Seven Hills Urology 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandler 2018 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard by Marriott Greensburg 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Dairy Restaurant #9 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eagle Machine 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE IOS- Tampa 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albertville 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amanti Art 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.