Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade · Tennessee

Big Bend Galvanizing

Trenton, TN · ~69 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Big Bend Galvanizing runs at 467% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade F.

Big Bend Galvanizing: 15.4 TCR = 467% of Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Big Bend Galvanizing safety composite

Big Bend Galvanizing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−13.6

2018→2024

Big Bend Galvanizing injury rate improved

Big Bend Galvanizing's TCR fell 13.6 from 21.4 in 2018 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 29.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=21.4 · 2019=29.9 · 2020=19.4 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Trenton, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 467% of ind

  • DART 7.8 DART
  • RANK #15/15
  • PHOTO Tennessee Galvanizin…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tennessee Galvanizing, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Big Bend Galvanizing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Big Bend Galvanizing averages 15.4 TCR (467% of the Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Big Bend Galvanizing TCR series: 2018=21.4 · 2019=29.9 · 2020=19.4 · 2021=14.1 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=6.6 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Big Bend Galvanizing falls in its industry

646 Galvanizing metals and metal p establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 15 Galvanizing metals and metal p employers in Tennessee.

Big Bend Galvanizing (69 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Big Bend Galvanizing
Big Bend Galvanizing (69 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Big Bend Galvanizing has more employees than the Galvanizing metals and metal products fo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 7.8 5 0 0
2023 6.6 3.3 4 0 0
2022 8.6 6.2 7 0 0
2021 14.1 14.1 7 0 0
2020 19.4 17.8 12 0 0
2019 29.9 24.5 11 0 0
2018 21.4 19.9 13 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · TN · Trenton

646 Galvanizing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 18 employers in Trenton, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tennessee Galvanizing, Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clad-rex, LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ReinCoat, LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bob Monnig Industries 15.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Volunteer Energy Cooperative - Decatur 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landmark Construction and Emergency Sericves 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Spear Ironworks LLC 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Region 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR MacLean Power Systems - Trenton 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR MacLean Power system 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR MacLean Power Systems 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gibson Electric Membership Corporation 103 FTE
NAT-TCR Petersburg 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Landing of Winder 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cascade Bottled Water 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Caslt - South Lake Tahoe 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jordan Process 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trillium Farms Main Office 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Grande at Laumeier Park 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE AllPro Restoration & Janitorial 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.