Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

The Landing of Winder

Winder, GA · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Landing of Winder runs at 406% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Landing of Winder: 15.4 TCR = 406% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Landing of Winder safety composite

The Landing of Winder scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Landing of Winder: 11.4 → 19.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 19.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.83× in 2024

The Landing of Winder's TCR rose 7.7 from 11.4 in 2021 to 19.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Winder, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.4 · 406% of ind

  • DART 12.7 DART
  • RANK #175/205
  • PHOTO Country Meadows of F…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Country Meadows of Frederick (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Landing of Winder in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Landing of Winder averages 15.4 TCR (406% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Landing of Winder TCR series: 2021=11.4 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=19.7 · 2024=19.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Landing of Winder falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #175 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

The Landing of Winder (51 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Landing of Winder
The Landing of Winder (51 employees, TCR 15.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Landing of Winder has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.1 12.7 6 0 0
2023 19.7 12.3 8 0 0
2022 11.4 8.6 4 0 0
2021 11.4 8.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Winder

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 57 employers in Winder, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Country Meadows of Frederick 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY TRUMBULL OPERATION LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Reserve at Mills Farm 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elite Care Oatfield Estates 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Williams Produce, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corteva 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE THREE NOTCH ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPARATION 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGLC Peachtree Service Center 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chico's Distribution, Inc. 617 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carvana Winder 481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chico's Distribution Services, LLC (DC-2) 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winder Price Industries 384 FTE
NAT-TCR Audeamus Sacramento 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Petersburg 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Bend Galvanizing 15.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cascade Bottled Water 15.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Agile Logistics Management LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Concrete Industries, Inc 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Atomics - Poway - A28 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Butera Market 501 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.