General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Tennessee

Big G Express Inc

Shelbyville, TN · ~623 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Big G Express Inc runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade B.

Big G Express Inc: 2.9 TCR = 64% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Big G Express Inc safety composite

Big G Express Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Big G Express Inc: 2.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Big G Express Inc's TCR rose 0.9 from 2.0 in 2017 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Shelbyville, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 64% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #58/128
  • PHOTO New Creation Transpo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 199 inj
  • SIZE ~623 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Creation Transport Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Big G Express Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Big G Express Inc averages 2.9 TCR (64% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Big G Express Inc TCR series: 2017=2 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=3 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=3 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Big G Express Inc falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 128 General freight trucking, long employers in Tennessee.

Big G Express Inc (623 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Big G Express Inc
Big G Express Inc (623 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Big G Express Inc has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.7 29 0 1
2023 3.5 2.7 28 0 0
2022 3.0 2.0 22 0 0
2021 2.8 1.9 22 0 0
2020 2.8 2.0 25 1 0
2019 3.0 2.1 27 0 1
2018 3.1 1.3 28 0 0
2017 2.0 1.0 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · TN · Shelbyville

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 56 employers in Shelbyville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Creation Transport Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Express Carlisle 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAM Transport - Laredo, TX 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knoxville/Lenoir City Terminal-DOT 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE JFSNA at Eastman Chemical Kingsport 624 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carlex Nashville 624 FTE
STATE-SIZE Malibu Boats, LLC TN Operations 622 FTE
STATE-SIZE TriStar Southern Hills Medical Center 624 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shelbyville Plant 1,399 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bedford County Board of Education 1,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6062 588 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6062 499 FTE
NAT-TCR Southern Airways Corporation 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Melrose Park 10453 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilmington Ma Distribution Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Msgul - Gulfport 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Warmerdam Packing, LLC 623 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne County Airport Authority 623 FTE
NAT-SIZE Behavioral Framework 623 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trump International Hotel Las Vegas 623 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.