Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Kentucky

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S

Henderson, KY · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S: 2.8 TCR = 233% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S safety composite

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S: 0.0 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S's TCR rose 5.6 from 0.0 in 2023 to 5.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Henderson, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.8 · 233% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/23
  • PHOTO Oak Creek Power Plant
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oak Creek Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S averages 2.8 TCR (233% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 23 Electric power generation, fos employers in Kentucky.

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S (37 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S
Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S (37 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · KY · Henderson

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 82 employers in Henderson, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oak Creek Power Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitchell 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amos Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR King Gen Plant-PD 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE CW Assemblies LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2850 RUSSELLVILLE BOWLING GREEN KY 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ontrac Inc Dba Blitz Builders Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE LFUCG - Water Quality - Sewer Line Maintenance 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gibbs Die Casting 995 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital main campus 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR Deaconess Henderson Hospital 586 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 694 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Hagerty Steel and Aluminum 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR USA Spokane 8900 Airport Dr 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Griffin Beverage CO Marquette 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR RECARO Aircraft Seating LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE TerraBella Summit 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arciform LLC 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Se - Quakertown 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pointe of North Gables 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.