Fossil Fuel Electric Generation · Minnesota

King Gen Plant-PD

Bayport, MN · ~83 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

King Gen Plant-PD runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Generation workplace, earning a grade F.

King Gen Plant-PD: 2.8 TCR = 233% of Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

King Gen Plant-PD safety composite

King Gen Plant-PD scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2021→2023

King Gen Plant-PD injury rate improved

King Gen Plant-PD's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.9 in 2021 to 2.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.9 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Bayport, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.8 · 233% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #12/24
  • PHOTO Oak Creek Power Plant
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oak Creek Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

King Gen Plant-PD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows King Gen Plant-PD averages 2.8 TCR (233% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

King Gen Plant-PD TCR series: 2021=3.9 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.3 · BLS 1.2

Where King Gen Plant-PD falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 24 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio employers in Minnesota.

King Gen Plant-PD (83 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate King Gen Plant-PD
King Gen Plant-PD (83 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

King Gen Plant-PD has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2021 3.9 3.9 1 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MN · Bayport

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 12 employers in Bayport, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oak Creek Power Plant 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Big Rivers Electric Corporation - ET&S 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mitchell 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amos Plant 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE MVEC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hy-Tec Construction of Brainerd, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE J&D Construction, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kraemer North America - Minnesota All Other 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayport Main - CORP 2,823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Corrections- Stillwater 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater 460 FTE
CITY-NEAR A.S. King Plant 95 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire-Seal LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2846 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Draper 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR USM Store #552 (United) 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tremron - Lalp 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE GrandeVille Senior Living Community 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE FFTY-Natomas Warehouse/Offices 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Al Warren Oil, Inc. 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.