Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences · California

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton

Pleasanton, CA · ~116 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences workplace, earning a grade F.

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton: 1.2 TCR = 244% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton safety composite

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2019

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Pleasanton, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 1.2 · 244% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #34/51
  • PHOTO Roswell Park Division
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Roswell Park Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton averages 1.2 TCR (244% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · BLS 0.5

Where Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton falls in its industry

189 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 51 Biotechnology research and dev employers in California.

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton (116 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton
Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton (116 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Bio-Rad Laboratories DBG Pleasanton has fewer employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.4 2.4 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · CA · Pleasanton

189 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in health sciences employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 169 employers in Pleasanton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Roswell Park Division 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Battelle - Charlottesville Operations 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR E Ink California, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BioLegend Main 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE TVH 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Suncrest Nurseries Inc. 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller Family Wine Company 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monarch Nut Company 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 138 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 624 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasanton Campus 1,561 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sciens Building Solutions LLC 1,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Pieper Houston Electric, LP - Houston Operations Office 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Neltec 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ0236CB6 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MilliporeSigma - BROADWAY 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nizhoni Health Systems LLC- Peabody 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE PolyOne 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Green Works Inc. 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diveresicare of Winfield 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.