Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Pennsylvania

Bio Test Medical, Inc.

Gibsonia, PA · ~95 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bio Test Medical, Inc. runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade B.

Bio Test Medical, Inc.: 3.7 TCR = 57% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bio Test Medical, Inc. safety composite

Bio Test Medical, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2016→2020

Bio Test Medical, Inc. injury rate improved

Bio Test Medical, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.7 from 5.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.7 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Gibsonia, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/243
  • PHOTO Concord
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Concord (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Bio Test Medical, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bio Test Medical, Inc. averages 3.7 TCR (57% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bio Test Medical, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=2 · 2020=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Bio Test Medical, Inc. falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 243 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Pennsylvania.

Bio Test Medical, Inc. (95 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Bio Test Medical, Inc.
Bio Test Medical, Inc. (95 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Bio Test Medical, Inc. has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 5.3 5.3 3 0 0
2017 5.5 2.7 2 0 0
2016 5.7 5.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · PA · Gibsonia

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 50 employers in Gibsonia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Concord 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR INI16 - 16TH STREET 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RICHMOND (VARMD) 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HPB2 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 301-NiSource-Uniontown PA 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE DL George and Sons Manufacturing Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Building Systems, Inc. 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA Field 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Giant Eagle #1291 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monark Student Transportation Gibsonia 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2262 - Richland Twp North 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2603 196 FTE
NAT-TCR Pacific West Management 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-965-West Elm 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 289 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sendik's Food Market New Berlin 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Victoria Manor 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX255 Sweetwater Gypsum 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Bear Lake Service Center 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.S. King Plant 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.