Fossil Fuel Electric Generation · Minnesota

A.S. King Plant

Bayport, MN · ~95 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

A.S. King Plant runs at 159% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Generation workplace, earning a grade D.

A.S. King Plant: 1.9 TCR = 159% of Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

A.S. King Plant safety composite

A.S. King Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

A.S. King Plant: 0.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.65× in 2020

A.S. King Plant's TCR rose 3.7 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Bayport, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.9 · 159% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #9/24
  • PHOTO Magic Valley Generat…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magic Valley Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

A.S. King Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows A.S. King Plant averages 1.9 TCR (159% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

A.S. King Plant TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=3.7 · BLS 1.2

Where A.S. King Plant falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 24 Fossil Fuel Electric Generatio employers in Minnesota.

A.S. King Plant (95 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate A.S. King Plant
A.S. King Plant (95 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

A.S. King Plant has more employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Generation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.7 1.2 1 2 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MN · Bayport

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 12 employers in Bayport, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magic Valley Generating Station 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springerville Generating Station 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHAWVILLE GENERATING STATION 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Newark Energy Center 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE White Bear Lake Service Center 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Valley Electric Cooperative 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE ONE WAY WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Drews Total Concrete 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayport Main - CORP 2,823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Corrections- Stillwater 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Correctional Facility - Stillwater 460 FTE
CITY-NEAR King Gen Plant-PD 83 FTE
NAT-TCR Foremost Farms - Reedsburg 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Casa Linda CL 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Moreno Valley DorFab 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Owen Godley TX 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Village Green of Bristol 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE TX255 Sweetwater Gypsum 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victoria Manor 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phifer- Columbus Street 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.