Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo

Camarillo, CA · ~24 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade B.

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo: 2.3 TCR = 52% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo safety composite

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2019→2022

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo injury rate improved

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo's TCR fell 6.6 from 6.6 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Camarillo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #160/620
  • PHOTO La Perla Verde Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: La Perla Verde Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo averages 2.3 TCR (52% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo TCR series: 2019=6.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.8 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #160 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo (24 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo
Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo (24 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo has fewer employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.6 6.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Camarillo

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 158 employers in Camarillo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR La Perla Verde Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cal Enterprise Labor Solutions, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grape Valley Contracting 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR L. Gonzales Corporation 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-09 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 558 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State University Channel Islands 1,552 FTE
CITY-NEAR Channel Islands Social Services 1,488 FTE
NAT-TCR Uni-Systems Engineering 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pillager District Office 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Press, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CHR- Manchester Site 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kennebec Ag/Terminal 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mcconnell Painting Corporation 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Henge 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vanduser Gin Co Inc 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.