Engineering services · Minnesota

Uni-Systems Engineering

Minneapolis, MN · ~46 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Uni-Systems Engineering runs at 468% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineering services workplace, earning a grade F.

Uni-Systems Engineering: 2.3 TCR = 468% of Engineering services BLS 0.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Uni-Systems Engineering safety composite

Uni-Systems Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2018→2022

Uni-Systems Engineering injury rate improved

Uni-Systems Engineering's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=5.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541330 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 2.3 · 468% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/33
  • PHOTO Oasis Construction S…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oasis Construction Services Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Uni-Systems Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Uni-Systems Engineering averages 2.3 TCR (468% of the Engineering services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Uni-Systems Engineering TCR series: 2018=5.5 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Uni-Systems Engineering falls in its industry

690 Engineering services establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 33 Engineering services employers in Minnesota.

Uni-Systems Engineering (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Uni-Systems Engineering
Uni-Systems Engineering (46 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 112 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Uni-Systems Engineering has fewer employees than the Engineering services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.2 0.0 2 1 0
2018 5.5 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541330 · MN · Minneapolis

690 Engineering services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oasis Construction Services Inc 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Reuter Hanney, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kalman & Company, Inc - VA - Corporate Office 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lorton 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canby 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elk River Municipal Utilities 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rogers 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE District Energy Saint Paul 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Bioline Agrosciences Camarillo 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Press, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CHR- Manchester Site 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AMA-ODFL 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Steven Nissan 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Creek Contracting LLC 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE E3 Entegral Solutions, Inc. 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jonesville Tool & Mfg, LLC 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.