Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing · Texas

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio

San Antonio, TX · ~28 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio: 8.0 TCR = 244% of Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio safety composite

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.2

2016→2018

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio injury rate improved

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio's TCR fell 14.2 from 16.9 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.9 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339112 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 244% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #41/42
  • PHOTO Jabil Healthcare Re…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio averages 8.0 TCR (244% of the Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio TCR series: 2016=16.9 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio falls in its industry

741 Surgical and Medical Instrumen establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 42 Surgical and Medical Instrumen employers in Texas.

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio (28 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio
Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio (28 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 174 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Biomedical Enterprises San Antonio has fewer employees than the Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2017 4.5 2.3 2 0 0
2016 16.9 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339112 · TX · San Antonio

741 Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jabil Healthcare Receiving/Sort 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corporation 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health Line International Corporation 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polymer Conversions, Inc. 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Apex Center 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rehabilitation Hospital of Overland Park 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Runnings of Dickinson 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3051 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 004 TRC Lion Square Lodge 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triplex 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Byram MS 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAP Gladu Wisconsin 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.